- August 2026 (1)
- July 2026 (8)
- June 2026 (7)
- May 2026 (2)
- April 2026 (11)
- March 2026 (3)
- February 2026 (4)
- January 2026 (4)
- December 2025 (1)
- November 2025 (3)
- October 2025 (9)
- September 2025 (3)
- August 2025 (5)
- July 2025 (1)
- June 2025 (2)
- May 2025 (3)
- April 2025 (2)
- March 2025 (7)
- February 2025 (10)
- January 2025 (6)
- December 2024 (7)
- September 2024 (1)
- August 2024 (2)
- July 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (2)
- April 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (2)
- April 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (2)
- September 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- November 2021 (1)
- March 2021 (1)
- February 2021 (2)
- August 2019 (1)
- November 2018 (1)
- May 2017 (1)
- December 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (1)
- August 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- August 2014 (1)
- March 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (1)
- October 2013 (3)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (1)
- June 2013 (1)
- February 2013 (1)
- October 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (1)
- October 2011 (1)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (1)
- February 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (3)
- November 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (3)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (3)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (5)
- October 2009 (2)
- September 2009 (2)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (5)
- February 2009 (5)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (3)
- November 2008 (7)
- October 2008 (4)
- September 2008 (2)
- August 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (4)
- December 2007 (3)
- March 2007 (3)
- February 2007 (1)
- January 2007 (2)
- December 2006 (4)
- November 2006 (18)
- AI (96)
- TIL deep dives (77)
- Python (75)
- LLM from scratch (48)
- Resolver One (34)
- PyTorch (21)
- TIL (21)
- Blogkeeping (19)
- PythonAnywhere (17)
- Linux (16)
- Startups (15)
- Gadgets (13)
- Hugging Face (13)
- NSLU2 offsite backup project (13)
- Funny (11)
- Musings (11)
- Finance (10)
- Fine-tuning LLMs (10)
- C (9)
- JAX (9)
- Personal (8)
- Robotics (8)
- Website design (8)
- 3D (5)
- Quick links (5)
- Rants (5)
- Cryptography (4)
- JavaScript (4)
- Music (4)
- Oddities (4)
- Talks (4)
- Dirigible (3)
- Eee (3)
- GPT-2 mysteries (3)
- Memes (3)
- Politics (3)
- Django (2)
- GPU Computing (2)
- LaTeX (2)
- MathML (2)
- Microprojects (2)
- OLPC XO (2)
- Retro Language Models (2)
- Space (2)
- VoIP (2)
- Copyright (1)
- Golang (1)
- poppy the training box (1)
- Raspberry Pi (1)
- Software development tools (1)
- Agile Abstractions
- antirez
- Astral Codex Ten
- :: (Bloggable a) => a -> IO ()
- David Friedman's Substack
- Econ & Energy
- Entrepreneurial Geekiness
- For some value of "Magic"
- Hackaday
- kaleidic.ai newsletter
- Knowing.NET
- Language Log
- Millennium Hand
- ntoll.org
- Obey the Testing Goat!
- One Useful Thing
- PK
- PythonAnywhere News
- Simon Willison's Weblog
- Societive
- Software Deviser
- Some opinions, held with varying degrees of certainty
- tartley.com
- the singularity is nearer
- Theia Vogel's website
Long S is long
A bunch of people have been posting interesting searches on Google Labs' Books Ngram viewer. I heard about it from this tweet by @njrabit, but the tantalising link (don't follow if you don't like swearing) at the bottom of this blog post by S. Weasel, showed up something interesting. Why is it that of four swearwords, the one starting with 'F' is incredibly popular from 1750 to 1820, then drops out of fashion for 140 years -- only appearing again in the 1960s?
An odd crontab problem
This took a little while to work out, so it's worth sharing here just in case anyone else has the same problems and is googling for solutions. We had a problem on one of our web servers at Resolver which manifested itself in some (but not all) cron jobs being run twice, which was causing all kinds of problems. Here's how we tracked it down and solved it.
Patronising messages
A quick rant -- why is it that Microsoft's "genuine advantage validation tool" feels the need to "show me some of the many advantages of using genuine software" after it has determined that my copy of Windows is legitimate? Seriously, can anyone think of a case where that wouldn't piss users off? I hate to think what it says if it finds out that you're using a pirated copy.
When Resolver starts selling software over the web, I will add a checkbox at the end of the checkout process. It will appear only if the customer's IP address belongs to Microsoft or to one of certain entertainment companies, it will be checked by default, it will be in large, friendly letters, and it will read "tell me about some of the benefits of not using stolen credit cards to buy software online."
MSBuild WTF: 'The error was:'
Here's a fun one for anyone who uses msbuild (at least, v2.0.50727). Create a project file like this:
<Project DefaultTargets="Foo" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<Target Name="Foo">
<Exec Command = "echo Hello!" />
</Target>
</Project>
From a command prompt, run the project; you will get a the effect you would expect.
Now replace the word "Hello" with "The error was: something random". Run it again.
C:\\Dev\\Resolver>msbuild foo.proj
Microsoft (R) Build Engine Version 2.0.50727.42
[Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 2.0.50727.42]
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 2005. All rights reserved.
Build started 15/11/2006 17:50:22.
__________________________________________________
Project "C:\\Dev\\Resolver\\foo.proj" (default targets):
Target Foo:
echo The error was: something random
EXEC : The error was: something random
C:\\Dev\\Resolver\\foo.proj(3,9): error MSB3073: The command "echo The error was: something random" exited with code -1.
Done building target "Foo" in project "foo.proj" -- FAILED.
Done building project "foo.proj" -- FAILED.
Build FAILED.
EXEC : The error was:
C:\\Dev\\Resolver\\foo.proj(3,9): error MSB3073: The command "echo The error was: something random" exited with code -1.
0 Warning(s)
2 Error(s)
Time Elapsed 00:00:00.09
C:\\Dev\\Resolver>
Fuzzyman and I bumped into this one at work today; our continuous integration server, which watches our Subversion repository and checks out, builds, and tests any code changes it sees, had reported a failure despite the fact that none of the tests had failed. It turned out that one test was quite innocently printing out the text "The error was: " followed by some logging information; it wasn't an error at all. As far as I can tell, the statement that the echo command exited with code -1 is absolute nonsense.
This behaviour is not documented anywhere that we were able to find; I can only assume it was added for some specific purpose in the context of Visual Studio...